{"id":"W2061131133","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03952_1.x","title":"Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of Quality of Life Index","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Brigham Young University","keywords":"Index (typography); Scale (ratio); Quality of life (healthcare); Quality (philosophy); Reliability (semiconductor); Content validity; Construct validity; Psychology; Computer science; Arabic; Applied psychology; Psychometrics; Gerontology; Medicine; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Clinical psychology; Nursing; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361171,0.0003481597,0.0005685927,0.00177544,0.0005812495,0.001404581,0.0006260531,0.0003983986,0.004516715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03791079,0.0001655181,0.00104208,0.001952988,0.0004472767,0.001195097,0.000948431,0.001038989,0.0007541745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008569925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009495699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001161565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959604,0.001250099,0.0005696014,0.0002519048,0.001790201,0.0001777789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840286,0.006825143,0.003191576,0.0005887488,0.004694276,0.0006716452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007658038,0.0006413406,0.8307655,0.0005859343,0.000401862,0.0001593226,0.002828973,0.001367143,0.0007404086,0.001182218,0.003764413,0.1567971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001251978,0.001225071,0.974423,0.0006697863,0.0002494506,0.000752431,0.002686018,0.003767568,0.000978866,0.001549574,0.01348736,0.00008573358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671742,0.00254198,0.003927322,0.001146333,0.0002050567,0.0006876536,0.002194104,0.00007091682,0.02205249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913074,0.0008517691,0.004818239,0.0002350248,0.00005109518,0.000537461,0.00120843,0.00002549836,0.0009651293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006361171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03364152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2420580888605192,"score_gpt":0.411992537713177,"score_spread":0.1699344488526578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}