{"id":"W2061159103","doi":"10.1139/p2012-101","title":"Gravitational binding energy in charged cylindrical symmetry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Relativity and Gravitational Theory","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Gravitation; Classical mechanics; Symmetry (geometry); Binding energy; Gravitational binding energy; Gravitational energy; Coupling (piping); Function (biology); Potential energy; Gravitational potential; Energy (signal processing); Quantum electrodynamics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000251328,0.00008396343,0.000145959,0.0001635209,0.0000774809,0.00002267606,0.0001018071,0.00003125273,0.0001444076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001502054,0.00008359522,0.0001033498,0.0002527358,0.00004591579,0.0003595952,0.000004511159,0.000226022,0.00002528849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007413716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003844707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006596504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001248241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99926,0.0000681018,0.0002208136,0.00005319624,0.0001317474,0.0002661336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992257,0.0001426666,0.0001462035,0.00005271691,0.00007616156,0.0003566018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003805227,0.00004335013,0.1422316,0.000001763174,0.00003287285,0.000003484103,0.0004679675,0.00009153094,0.0001898073,0.8501533,0.0003636864,0.006416818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009257556,0.00005605552,0.09745014,0.00009028307,0.00003761398,0.00001291664,0.000909993,0.00009656362,0.002148451,0.8880795,0.009855928,0.0003368219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757867,0.0002831115,0.0115228,0.0003381212,0.0008492642,0.00004625104,0.00008486101,0.000002217517,0.01108668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982566,5.879163e-7,0.0004135762,0.00006799791,0.0010322,0.000001407065,0.00002603612,0.000009985471,0.0001915619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04478143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3408915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01670679310668605,"score_gpt":0.2436362302130002,"score_spread":0.2269294371063142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}