{"id":"W2061159103","doi":"10.1139/p2012-101","title":"Gravitational binding energy in charged cylindrical symmetry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Relativity and Gravitational Theory","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Gravitation; Classical mechanics; Symmetry (geometry); Binding energy; Gravitational binding energy; Gravitational energy; Coupling (piping); Function (biology); Potential energy; Gravitational potential; Energy (signal processing); Quantum electrodynamics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007142972,0.0008604328,0.001111262,0.001356322,0.001601133,0.001652701,0.001082051,0.001409114,0.003470911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009299057,0.0004836522,0.0005961137,0.0008086043,0.002451481,0.001498959,0.001588376,0.000575382,0.000753196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008498337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003096708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00185775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994891,0.00008510669,0.00001517592,0.00005168627,0.0001940215,0.0001649819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997395,0.00007694035,0.0000448295,0.00003902257,0.00004434129,0.00005542667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003256845,0.00001688917,0.0002309521,0.00003957634,0.00001131283,0.0001687934,0.00007349614,0.01044928,0.005271491,0.9820476,0.0003363482,0.001321729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009043435,0.0002037519,0.004511422,0.00004892358,0.00004539014,0.0006656343,0.0003011892,0.1962775,0.003870898,0.7901062,0.003750275,0.0001285375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.753949,0.002448183,0.1178816,0.001063227,0.0003471792,0.00006044172,0.0001317932,0.0003170726,0.1238015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852543,0.0003886676,0.004683837,0.0001672132,0.00006835631,0.00004599615,0.00006718298,0.00007046466,0.009254058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003470911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01161128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01670679310668605,"score_gpt":0.2436362302130002,"score_spread":0.2269294371063142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}