{"id":"W2061194197","doi":"10.1509/jppm.23.2.193.51400","title":"Meta-Analyses of the Effectiveness of Warning Labels","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Safety Warnings and Signage","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Moderation; Psychology; Comprehension; Compliance (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Reading comprehension; Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Communication; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0176562,0.0001763968,0.0008680988,0.0004761496,0.00009994843,0.00002818714,0.0006066876,0.0001028139,0.0004414556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008553005,0.0001044468,0.000992832,0.0009109688,0.0001480268,0.0001949783,0.0001238182,0.0004424835,0.000002805742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001029107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003747993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005286353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003286205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940906,0.003820952,0.001060762,0.0001540013,0.0005111659,0.0003625216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938245,0.002988372,0.002230435,0.0003425776,0.0005088474,0.0001052969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002851166,0.001867077,0.1592416,0.001189167,0.06651299,0.0001283318,0.008479319,0.005490184,0.6410715,0.0799744,0.001102029,0.03209223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003364102,0.000307336,0.9655037,0.0004432642,0.00407241,0.0003609586,0.001130981,0.00001171699,0.01752872,0.004780503,0.002219269,0.0002770454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979469,0.001952713,0.0007334292,0.001879474,0.0003039406,0.0001207336,0.000007195156,0.000009122706,0.01552439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990951,0.00001841958,0.000320176,0.0001165379,0.0002467907,0.000003586803,3.667037e-7,0.00002279961,0.0001762342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8062621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1504153201972849,"score_gpt":0.408187742581172,"score_spread":0.2577724223838871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}