{"id":"W2061194197","doi":"10.1509/jppm.23.2.193.51400","title":"Meta-Analyses of the Effectiveness of Warning Labels","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Safety Warnings and Signage","field":"Psychology","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Moderation; Psychology; Comprehension; Compliance (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Reading comprehension; Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Communication; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03977425,0.003620367,0.01206873,0.005880921,0.0006338475,0.003124593,0.002076475,0.002449418,0.002432179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1144789,0.001594749,0.03404583,0.004285277,0.001051508,0.001778718,0.001454004,0.003298864,0.0003029136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002310584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001653227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003213842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005375293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712842,0.01847879,0.005187528,0.002434763,0.002310692,0.000304038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8848231,0.09878749,0.009419938,0.003990822,0.002396053,0.0005825642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004235898,0.00005892209,0.003705735,0.04334849,0.9372275,0.00008583028,0.00008064808,0.000576292,0.0002435909,0.0001774513,0.0004461039,0.00981351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008618209,0.000379015,0.003305971,0.002743585,0.9909425,0.00004891478,0.0000250219,0.000163387,0.0003113012,0.0003375506,0.0008649548,0.00001586516],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04528635,0.9433793,0.005603643,0.001080651,0.001005442,0.0008001507,0.001519377,0.0001638313,0.001161233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6646914,0.31638,0.01141678,0.00179598,0.0007860348,0.0021742,0.001820197,0.0001588624,0.0007765069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2103488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1504153201972849,"score_gpt":0.408187742581172,"score_spread":0.2577724223838871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}