{"id":"W2061202489","doi":"10.1007/s10570-009-9314-0","title":"Flocculation of cellulose fibres: new comparison of crowding factor with percolation and effective-medium theories","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cellulose","topic":"Advanced Cellulose Research Studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flocculation; Percolation threshold; Crowding; Rigidity (electromagnetism); Percolation theory; Materials science; Percolation (cognitive psychology); Macromolecular crowding; Composite material; Physics; Chemistry; Conductivity; Electrical resistivity and conductivity; Quantum mechanics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685109,0.0007046941,0.001013161,0.00216016,0.0005381115,0.0009413935,0.001429285,0.001108384,0.0005907278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004215025,0.0002194011,0.0009053595,0.0008219602,0.001677135,0.00317728,0.0009579148,0.0007946652,0.00009141838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001136684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004593447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000616618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993823,0.0001170438,0.00003539204,0.0001186931,0.0002942944,0.00005230017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978398,0.001473261,0.0001873799,0.0001557898,0.000239147,0.0001047169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001166895,0.0005108523,0.006272843,0.001950164,0.0003230597,0.0009648939,0.0008721763,0.1483969,0.3475355,0.3787951,0.001468163,0.1117434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007306487,0.0003952468,0.004515596,0.00007069382,0.0001424636,0.0005258143,0.0001216807,0.7270989,0.1462702,0.1177262,0.002896776,0.0001633892],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5379462,0.01705364,0.4324532,0.0006479256,0.0003667666,0.000141474,0.0001624924,0.0003923789,0.01083586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800823,0.002885368,0.01580122,0.00005616187,0.0001337147,0.00003657413,0.00006751344,0.00004610159,0.0008911222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00216016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008911848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01801533277191272,"score_gpt":0.3066450760962159,"score_spread":0.2886297433243032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}