{"id":"W2061233749","doi":"10.1016/s0016-0032(03)00017-6","title":"A frequency domain approach to state estimation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Franklin Institute","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Control theory (sociology); State observer; Frequency domain; Observer (physics); Computer science; Estimation; State (computer science); Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Control (management); Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004034877,0.00009248454,0.0001586103,0.00009028045,0.00006970549,0.00004101936,0.0001890191,0.00004032215,0.000006682271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008547871,0.00006203877,0.0001094267,0.0002343126,0.00001767198,0.0001922911,0.000005960982,0.0002076537,0.00002816808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009060622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003548412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009459935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000999379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991959,0.0000518352,0.0003567277,0.00005338366,0.000216908,0.0001252333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996126,0.00001038519,0.00008923157,0.000156891,0.00005096329,0.00007990643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001300158,0.00003808645,0.0001490764,0.00004707821,0.0001140706,0.00000726417,0.0008224019,0.9780336,0.01066233,0.004975747,0.001907134,0.003230192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008375786,0.0003426571,0.005178391,0.0007782117,0.0002273804,0.003228277,0.0008194191,0.2584711,0.01808438,0.06440687,0.6386253,0.001462211],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3830112,0.0004189536,0.5818288,0.0001610567,0.005885766,0.0003446489,0.000003441121,0.00006008393,0.02828607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824772,0.000008092367,0.01716615,0.00009390065,0.00009241055,0.00001104974,1.387844e-7,0.00001260874,0.0001384324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7195625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2529867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00837581729262628,"score_gpt":0.208340897064465,"score_spread":0.1999650797718387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}