{"id":"W2061304811","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2621.2002.00558.x","title":"Absorption kinetics of oxygen scavengers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Food Science & Technology","topic":"Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scavenger; Chemistry; Absorption (acoustics); Kinetics; Oxygen; Scavenging; Radical; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Nuclear chemistry; Chromatography; Antioxidant; Organic chemistry; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004947871,0.0004958738,0.0003228404,0.0002593923,0.0001681295,0.0002724779,0.0003805515,0.0004186312,0.001253876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00111254,0.0001783221,0.0003017471,0.0001706539,0.0001500264,0.0003416136,0.0003311028,0.0003924662,0.0004370929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001926229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009507989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008678044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995933,0.00007108417,0.0000353381,0.0001204762,0.0001138348,0.00006597298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989803,0.000228183,0.0002015416,0.0001185181,0.0004008703,0.00007062083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001680662,0.00002018832,0.0003336581,0.0000706471,0.00001504607,0.00001085437,0.00003100409,0.0001006381,0.9964561,0.0000148266,0.00005707074,0.00272191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008493451,0.0004003671,0.001822741,0.000009466719,0.0000264393,0.00003450773,0.00002140044,0.0006203539,0.9953228,0.0000130516,0.001712892,0.000007485122],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894093,0.002515562,0.006720351,0.00004979576,0.00004625734,0.00005039796,0.0002369538,0.0001193981,0.0008519513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846863,0.001165806,0.008136376,0.00007616767,0.00002889359,0.0001094964,0.0009191844,0.00007726384,0.004800629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001253876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004194617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01690494596044197,"score_gpt":0.2603856872123588,"score_spread":0.2434807412519169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}