{"id":"W2061329264","doi":"10.1080/07900620500108494","title":"Water Allocation among Multiple Stakeholders: Conflict Analysis of the Waiahole Water Project, Hawaii","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Water Resources Development","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Water resources; Ditch; Population; Water trading; Competition (biology); Business; Resource allocation; Optimal allocation; Water resource management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Water conservation; Environmental science; Management; Sociology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001559841,0.0001508611,0.0003878355,0.0006697137,0.00008595979,0.0001102185,0.0006599738,0.00006770255,0.0002461745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002816241,0.00007860427,0.0002684606,0.0001033795,0.00007579969,0.0002644514,0.0001444797,0.0001567459,0.00008788151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001887004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001343772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001300051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007641548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979106,0.00006058436,0.001356981,0.00019173,0.0002289187,0.0002512171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990056,0.00002910314,0.0005087128,0.0001670959,0.0002430343,0.00004647395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003905999,0.0006423994,0.7106821,0.00006479066,0.01050755,0.00002108795,0.2348309,0.02084939,0.0174649,0.001324482,0.0005129933,0.002708794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001802085,0.0000665942,0.1032413,0.0001448613,0.0001571682,0.00003837452,0.001626654,0.002699961,0.28967,0.000335455,0.5997744,0.0004430436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963576,0.00007141731,0.0006686687,0.0011259,0.0004753385,0.0001354762,0.00001420759,0.000008304295,0.001143076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969379,0.000007142924,0.0002609934,0.0001296474,0.0001831803,0.000007889927,0.00002911498,0.00001540853,0.002428749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6074408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3205389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06511568998868027,"score_gpt":0.2412568649452572,"score_spread":0.1761411749565769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}