{"id":"W2061477359","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0058067","title":"The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A Review with a Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Item Content and Factor Structure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":552,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Differential item functioning; Anhedonia; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; Clinical psychology; Item response theory; Psychology; PsycINFO; Psychometrics; Confirmatory factor analysis; Scale (ratio); Depressive symptoms; Medicine; Psychiatry; MEDLINE; Structural equation modeling; Anxiety; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02198706,0.001798403,0.004623587,0.0127085,0.0005714954,0.002366587,0.002867549,0.001524315,0.001647029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0389832,0.0009001216,0.002895821,0.01682398,0.001435632,0.002251045,0.001543797,0.003104913,0.0009464397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003072573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005981646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007784366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01084827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866458,0.005584224,0.003094471,0.001000492,0.003460339,0.0002145967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974239,0.01445113,0.003177426,0.0007196001,0.007078956,0.0003338756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001842733,0.0001079146,0.01119383,0.05173249,0.001336541,0.00008386823,0.0002326862,0.0002608623,0.0001588431,0.001895215,0.03929703,0.8935165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000289838,0.0004132573,0.1061691,0.201495,0.006370586,0.002569171,0.0006919414,0.00121019,0.0004606906,0.007142873,0.6729043,0.0002830246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003832171,0.9951521,0.00143926,0.001317424,0.0003555978,0.0001847622,0.0004318882,0.00002833322,0.0007073886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003981843,0.9904414,0.003259526,0.0006910844,0.0003077072,0.0004686728,0.0006807862,0.00001159683,0.0001574182],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02198706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8519675177471471,"score_gpt":0.5481175019615244,"score_spread":0.3038500157856227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}