{"id":"W2061482076","doi":"10.1080/0964056042000243258","title":"Informing the development of decision support tools for risk management: the case of electrical and magnetic fields","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Accountability; Focus group; Risk management; Government (linguistics); Stakeholder engagement; Process (computing); Public relations; Hazard; Business; Knowledge management; Public participation; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09926879,0.00192241,0.001001495,0.005836803,0.009125405,0.01252055,0.00396329,0.006991257,0.003781123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1108925,0.001361707,0.001242272,0.00288892,0.01180156,0.01423305,0.01205228,0.004747939,0.000784105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006186601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01056685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003530556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005810623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8899903,0.09429662,0.003371823,0.001623308,0.008145206,0.002572677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7500039,0.2260218,0.007851132,0.005881951,0.007982074,0.002259102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004783838,0.0009170671,0.009104935,0.003060341,0.0001919842,0.006721396,0.4634841,0.02453543,0.007755652,0.1001647,0.006327956,0.3772581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003280461,0.0009735557,0.00484781,0.006351328,0.0001938791,0.003273328,0.3851227,0.06089726,0.01199813,0.3035445,0.221913,0.0005564559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2995626,0.001875521,0.6073446,0.02978829,0.0002936756,0.002654881,0.0002116085,0.0007584905,0.05751037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6392426,0.0009636449,0.3556038,0.0009540527,0.00006335267,0.0008300867,0.0001344479,0.00009738569,0.002110597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09926879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5249898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01742374984821034,"score_gpt":0.2849702453478223,"score_spread":0.267546495499612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}