{"id":"W2061498563","doi":"10.1016/j.tsf.2004.04.051","title":"Quantitative analysis of electrodeposited tin film morphologies by atomic force microscopy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thin Solid Films","topic":"Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Materials science; Nanometre; Surface finish; Characterization (materials science); Micrometer; Thin film; Substrate (aquarium); Tin; Grain size; Surface roughness; Atomic force microscopy; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Optics; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001593131,0.0001788388,0.0004121567,0.0001266044,0.00004307697,0.00002273754,0.000193851,0.0001058754,0.00008814441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003897252,0.0001674281,0.0001363095,0.000704829,0.00005775246,0.00009421995,0.0000250302,0.0001574464,0.0000353644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007244191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000147741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001302899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000247377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989681,0.00001902038,0.0003061751,0.0001895639,0.000198073,0.0003190977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995413,0.0000469844,0.00005835641,0.0002382689,0.0000594618,0.00005567466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002828405,0.00004333845,0.001166331,0.0000257627,0.0007416514,0.000003245442,0.0004908304,0.28197,0.7145464,0.0004015669,0.0005469231,0.00003570906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004963383,0.0001138749,0.004209967,0.00003492706,0.0003776573,0.000001057272,0.0001661104,0.1138297,0.8801007,0.0003971683,0.00002298177,0.0002495437],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767939,0.0009761723,0.02093381,0.00002973856,0.0001079112,0.0001170119,0.0000688903,0.0001853166,0.0007872062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987905,0.0001044884,0.01177285,0.00004116038,0.000004397918,0.0000123203,0.00006021079,0.00002702413,0.00007256908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1681403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.682752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01371923197820502,"score_gpt":0.2684651754179828,"score_spread":0.2547459434397778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}