{"id":"W2061498563","doi":"10.1016/j.tsf.2004.04.051","title":"Quantitative analysis of electrodeposited tin film morphologies by atomic force microscopy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thin Solid Films","topic":"Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Materials science; Nanometre; Surface finish; Characterization (materials science); Micrometer; Thin film; Substrate (aquarium); Tin; Grain size; Surface roughness; Atomic force microscopy; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Optics; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002558144,0.0002725743,0.0002796601,0.0004892183,0.0003417839,0.0003542183,0.0003596833,0.0003234411,0.001585604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005555104,0.0002093982,0.0001554186,0.0004311561,0.000235812,0.0002916836,0.0001489604,0.000481905,0.0002653838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003765401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001437374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001981247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003533982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997818,0.00001763014,0.00001469828,0.00004706456,0.0001098091,0.00002907325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996222,0.0001330091,0.0000472007,0.00004804718,0.0001293413,0.00002026897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001975108,0.00001427899,0.0001573033,0.00001605997,0.000003117145,0.00002031589,0.00001972668,0.00006420189,0.9982066,0.00003823559,0.00003667748,0.001403681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003735686,0.00004615185,0.004968393,0.000001980163,0.000007688997,0.00004475853,0.00002552277,0.003166488,0.9910685,0.00002666997,0.0006349628,0.00000508748],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727592,0.0006401679,0.02225427,0.00007114672,0.00005736537,0.00006859191,0.0008829099,0.0004039267,0.002862243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591646,0.0006658778,0.03482328,0.00004777523,0.0000211061,0.0001015124,0.0007823415,0.0001092645,0.00428413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001981247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005304396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01371923197820502,"score_gpt":0.2684651754179828,"score_spread":0.2547459434397778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}