{"id":"W2061531626","doi":"10.1007/s11575-006-0050-5","title":"The acquisition of tacit knowledge in China: An empirical analysis of the ‘supplier-side individual level’ and ‘recipient-side’ factors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management International Review","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; China; Supply side; Business; Empirical research; Side effect (computer science); Demand side; Industrial organization; Economics; Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Commerce; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114045,0.0001875249,0.000331616,0.0006634375,0.0001315434,0.0001363856,0.0006733548,0.00003474451,0.0001167404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004950365,0.0001189291,0.0001774054,0.00206481,0.000100896,0.0003436973,0.000612697,0.000100471,0.00001464723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006180068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008059255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001472622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007439019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981516,0.00004387281,0.0008004237,0.0002849432,0.0005366712,0.0001824754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988613,0.00005390652,0.0005257837,0.0003404565,0.0002107805,0.000007840997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001925617,0.0004259074,0.2227673,0.001086393,0.0007573576,0.00000194949,0.00007701697,0.00006422798,0.00001253288,0.7412217,0.006704786,0.02686162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003167074,0.000006395368,0.9088047,0.000424743,0.000722145,1.61773e-7,0.0002279958,0.001223879,0.00001484072,0.002930922,0.08518511,0.0001424459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4564605,0.004990779,0.0006318372,0.005618192,0.001167453,0.001840769,0.00005842465,0.00005690941,0.5291752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967765,0.0007138721,0.00006499307,0.0008198207,0.0001251555,0.00004749892,0.0002383119,0.00001283238,0.001201003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7382907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4849789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04269830367680821,"score_gpt":0.3078026065204292,"score_spread":0.265104302843621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}