{"id":"W2061531626","doi":"10.1007/s11575-006-0050-5","title":"The acquisition of tacit knowledge in China: An empirical analysis of the ‘supplier-side individual level’ and ‘recipient-side’ factors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management International Review","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; China; Supply side; Business; Empirical research; Side effect (computer science); Demand side; Industrial organization; Economics; Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Commerce; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001514744,0.0003032445,0.0004310842,0.002135913,0.001150589,0.001569972,0.0006873512,0.0005405108,0.002447949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003160145,0.0002731619,0.0003241273,0.004391965,0.001056257,0.00148462,0.001120802,0.0004259721,0.0002208263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003568247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005428225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1666297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2332351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990968,0.0001413094,0.00008530597,0.0001034694,0.0003125404,0.0002606328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948015,0.001584206,0.001598489,0.0002725479,0.0009605857,0.0007827293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008936573,0.0001926763,0.9771722,0.00006287696,0.0000550169,0.0005012698,0.005740276,0.0008154474,0.0006412974,0.000837422,0.0003018439,0.01359025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005620749,0.00006266002,0.9950504,0.00001144959,0.00002702224,0.00004551468,0.00291553,0.001135572,0.0002249547,0.0001210966,0.0003917834,0.00000833634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991186,0.00006498344,0.00003008754,0.00003316264,6.274047e-7,0.00000459608,0.00003080254,0.000001013735,0.0007161621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00006148314,0.00002570935,0.000008096019,9.658938e-7,0.000002853831,0.00005169554,6.051567e-7,0.000459332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1666297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3313196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04269830367680821,"score_gpt":0.3078026065204292,"score_spread":0.265104302843621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}