{"id":"W2061574158","doi":"10.1108/14635780510584346","title":"The Swedish property crisis in retrospect: a new look at appraisal bias","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Property Investment and Finance","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Reservation; Economics; Value (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Originality; Quality (philosophy); Property value; Market value; Actuarial science; Property market; Econometrics; Financial economics; Accounting; Real estate; Finance; Database; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02782797,0.0002212398,0.0005083987,0.004268929,0.0008266644,0.003517393,0.0006365117,0.0006323861,0.001784985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1197265,0.00020323,0.0003927731,0.003544259,0.002120556,0.003825192,0.00251196,0.001143121,0.0001886387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001708051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001079768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004999897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008241759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834351,0.009292793,0.002026165,0.0007811001,0.004021735,0.0004431326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8817948,0.0628714,0.03232274,0.006327427,0.0155745,0.001109079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004238794,0.00004756761,0.8184728,0.0006128583,0.0002122147,0.0007199081,0.04374984,0.0003534929,0.0003830502,0.004991957,0.007579152,0.1224534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001606081,0.0002269341,0.8876847,0.001670638,0.00009713252,0.001278428,0.06768739,0.001034108,0.0004373401,0.009685933,0.03008895,0.00009234095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566901,0.01259355,0.003670109,0.01044396,0.0006695203,0.00008887403,0.00057314,0.00002589356,0.01524477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949946,0.002060436,0.0009740657,0.0007779135,0.0003131341,0.00003905286,0.0001748019,0.00001578643,0.000650103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02782797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1471701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04315661665967015,"score_gpt":0.2274398876276037,"score_spread":0.1842832709679335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}