{"id":"W2061708547","doi":"10.1163/157180511x552054","title":"Universalism and Equal Sovereignty as Contested Myths of International Law in the Sino-Western Encounter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Universalism; China; Extraterritoriality; Political science; International law; Law; Historiography; Economic Justice; Mythology; Diplomacy; Political economy; History; Sociology; Politics; Jurisdiction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01069638,0.0003881373,0.0005941059,0.001702362,0.007569134,0.0105316,0.0009335833,0.003166741,0.001474123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005974471,0.000307168,0.0002383505,0.001750808,0.1300268,0.009419613,0.0068706,0.006349825,0.0000922292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007483438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004142208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007641985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004724031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951638,0.003310428,0.0001347322,0.0004062334,0.000456051,0.0005286912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962535,0.002444114,0.0003031644,0.0004847853,0.0002507924,0.0002635435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000516815,0.000006216696,0.000160893,0.000009984954,0.000001728383,0.00004254763,0.06077632,0.00004777144,0.00005544935,0.9378276,0.0001854865,0.0008808313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002262498,0.00002943661,0.0009264215,0.0001953619,0.000008339053,0.0001054748,0.06501536,0.0008163985,0.000320152,0.8998591,0.03267979,0.00002155651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.521509,0.008774602,0.01584576,0.05692949,0.0004352488,0.00005650925,0.0000340918,0.00006144155,0.3963538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973704,0.0002737034,0.0003534393,0.0005028488,0.00004313778,0.00001353806,0.000003414721,0.000005733051,0.001433839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01069638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05656856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02685247945146637,"score_gpt":0.2424720174555993,"score_spread":0.2156195380041329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}