{"id":"W2061781847","doi":"10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.011","title":"Evidence-based Reviews and Databases: Are They Worth the Effort? Developing Evidence Summaries for Emergency Medicine","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Emergency Medicine","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Observational study; Evidence-based medicine; Resource (disambiguation); Quality (philosophy); MEDLINE; Interactivity; Health care; Database; Medical emergency; Knowledge management; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3942418,0.003105794,0.01728895,0.03669444,0.002539067,0.02283997,0.008095755,0.0150028,0.006687873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7693352,0.004992992,0.009530778,0.03984939,0.005051632,0.0387442,0.007245337,0.009488716,0.0020963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01162192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02958969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007574097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02593753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5470396,0.3055649,0.1047842,0.004386118,0.03692173,0.001303596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1493678,0.6963859,0.07233768,0.02400771,0.05328021,0.004620646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001025072,0.0001638711,0.002688078,0.2999428,0.01044546,0.0002271066,0.002036815,0.00125681,0.0003225862,0.01523013,0.07073753,0.5959238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001831243,0.0005418439,0.004451592,0.7551033,0.0187931,0.0003147197,0.002178587,0.00188319,0.0003798263,0.03894467,0.1751227,0.0004551553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00130299,0.8817493,0.01154681,0.09230277,0.006600175,0.002753144,0.0007460719,0.0002761149,0.002722632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0191778,0.8037518,0.1316357,0.02981625,0.00666837,0.007057982,0.0008763968,0.0001305522,0.0008851413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6057582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7470078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6320782065022493,"score_gpt":0.5954906200981246,"score_spread":0.03658758640412474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}