{"id":"W2061807824","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.034","title":"Emergy accounting for regional studies: Case study of Canada and its provinces","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Emergy; Environmental accounting; Renewable energy; Renewable resource; Resource (disambiguation); Sustainability; Non-renewable resource; Natural resource economics; Sustainable development; Consumption (sociology); Natural resource; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Accounting; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002157468,0.0003131659,0.0003184519,0.002953177,0.00209451,0.00349363,0.001569739,0.0005086535,0.001602219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009297263,0.0001713915,0.0003849347,0.009270557,0.0008431519,0.001578303,0.001207146,0.000591458,0.00005846429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02004293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01935461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990466,0.0002105912,0.00006559409,0.0001060509,0.0002931109,0.0002779966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941403,0.002140512,0.0005398226,0.0004732007,0.002320242,0.0003858703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002983142,0.0001352734,0.5419992,0.0003662678,0.0002491798,0.002510167,0.00608404,0.1188461,0.001118349,0.06403247,0.01271935,0.2516412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004594881,0.000113629,0.5610033,0.0006249881,0.000417104,0.001065195,0.0510341,0.2738692,0.002692295,0.02746398,0.08150029,0.0001699348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.961374,0.002299751,0.008470892,0.001760814,0.00002240796,0.0001302931,0.002949861,0.00008223309,0.02290983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890526,0.0009427452,0.006316678,0.00003737052,0.000007887613,0.00001221057,0.0004944552,0.00002639555,0.003109757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03737378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1454223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01488825295982868,"score_gpt":0.226531655261632,"score_spread":0.2116434023018033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}