{"id":"W2061860834","doi":"10.1017/s1431927605506792","title":"The Validation of Monte Carlo Methods for Scanning Electron Microscopy and Electron Microprobe Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Electron microprobe; Monte Carlo method; Microprobe; Microanalysis; Electron microscope; Microscopy; Electron probe microanalysis; Materials science; Scanning electron microscope; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Physics; Optics; Mineralogy; Mathematics; Statistics; Chromatography; Metallurgy; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00226219,0.0004486256,0.0009243031,0.000491995,0.0008400013,0.0003800525,0.0004398839,0.0001985933,0.00003290904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008346249,0.0003571878,0.0004048319,0.00107643,0.0004041565,0.0002906835,0.0001202893,0.0002490408,0.000002702651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001744633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000997057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004724753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004956913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968173,0.0003422369,0.0008564994,0.0008766601,0.0001851503,0.000922152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981101,0.0003359991,0.0005490734,0.0006019594,0.0002669832,0.0001359395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002227119,0.00005901868,0.001026962,0.0000412639,0.0005546321,2.064876e-7,0.0004069711,0.00005102976,0.9935979,0.0002184746,0.0004047433,0.003416135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004261501,0.0002997559,0.0002159677,0.00002161606,0.002313763,0.000008156025,0.00009495147,0.0008821058,0.985505,0.0002757881,0.009588597,0.0003681066],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055078,0.01901626,0.07407498,0.0006150291,0.0000458778,0.0005435829,0.00004630131,0.0001008894,0.00004925687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7656496,0.002917571,0.2299898,0.0002083477,0.00009332866,0.0001268459,0.00003982931,0.00005508601,0.0009196715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1559148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0101237943575118,"score_gpt":0.3504470653140038,"score_spread":0.340323270956492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}