{"id":"W2061870174","doi":"10.1155/2012/852384","title":"Cutting Edge PBPK Models and Analyses: Providing the Basis for Future Modeling Efforts and Bridges to Emerging Toxicology Paradigms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Toxicology","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling; Human health; Computer science; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Data science; Biochemical engineering; Management science; Computational biology; Bioinformatics; Medicine; Biology; Engineering; Pharmacokinetics; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02125161,0.001738302,0.002148656,0.001602988,0.0006366361,0.005227339,0.003690915,0.003593833,0.002437425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04029936,0.0009924505,0.001540948,0.001902492,0.002612999,0.01063825,0.003677032,0.007649214,0.001141634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001572176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001714265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001251933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916891,0.005280853,0.000531025,0.0004589822,0.001881448,0.0001585783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632639,0.02881277,0.00163654,0.003131453,0.002780921,0.0003743955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000468222,0.0001290899,0.001303409,0.0008873788,0.0001463582,0.0001249509,0.0003062011,0.1392891,0.0008864188,0.7304342,0.01294059,0.1135054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001292625,0.00006463847,0.0002483067,0.0003802521,0.00004372582,0.00004401887,0.00009613807,0.2043069,0.0005504335,0.7604684,0.03374832,0.00003576862],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002252724,0.008770029,0.961462,0.02110153,0.0005954713,0.00006554862,0.0001731779,0.000289503,0.00528997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07984506,0.04673689,0.8603212,0.004775076,0.003120729,0.0005481205,0.0004848251,0.000420289,0.003747862],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02125161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1123906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.583268262767895,"score_gpt":0.5725538369461494,"score_spread":0.01071442582174564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}