{"id":"W2061950318","doi":"10.1097/phm.0b013e3181ae0e70","title":"A Conceptual Framework of Outcomes for Caregivers of Assistive Technology Users","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal","funders":"Miljøstyrelsen","keywords":"Stressor; Assistive technology; Conceptual framework; Set (abstract data type); Conceptual model; Applied psychology; Psychology; Rehabilitation; Conceptual design; Medicine; Computer science; Clinical psychology; Human–computer interaction; Physical therapy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0349985,0.00192425,0.001370002,0.008949366,0.002313194,0.005999514,0.004107691,0.00207611,0.001271838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04591977,0.0004172531,0.001822849,0.005774205,0.008245642,0.009293684,0.004608246,0.003806143,0.0002959628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01001493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01610219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005354449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006229883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845482,0.01015702,0.001711811,0.0007355161,0.002496331,0.0003512882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798412,0.009995523,0.003528039,0.0006956325,0.004728233,0.001211433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001540721,0.0005711613,0.02736356,0.009999502,0.0002514134,0.0008657256,0.09058448,0.004958203,0.0007257472,0.5237933,0.016224,0.3245088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002019806,0.0009521747,0.05722053,0.05420045,0.0007201137,0.003744078,0.1822209,0.01295688,0.001048075,0.4571457,0.2292341,0.0003550568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1367981,0.2134299,0.4229871,0.1469282,0.003661651,0.008466553,0.002326031,0.0005716177,0.06483082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6817818,0.05747609,0.2393909,0.0044308,0.000529744,0.01119278,0.002900655,0.000066851,0.002230462],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0349985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1850919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05777299493654786,"score_gpt":0.4912632650741784,"score_spread":0.4334902701376306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}