{"id":"W2062018867","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00081.x","title":"Modelling the influence of landscape connectivity on animal distribution: a functional grain approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Landscape connectivity; Woodland caribou; Ecology; Resistance (ecology); Spatial distribution; Spatial ecology; Functional connectivity; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Predation; Computer science; Biology; Biological dispersal; Population; Remote sensing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001303681,0.00007517771,0.00006562471,0.00002476905,0.0001560277,0.00002628173,0.00009622533,0.00003105632,0.0006733604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001387209,0.00005278772,0.00007584347,0.0003320721,0.0001125762,0.0002662388,0.00003165235,0.0001060385,0.000113518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001631115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004164837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000747594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008528067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993845,0.00004019356,0.0001268771,0.0001654562,0.0001707582,0.0001121932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996502,0.00006712945,0.00007110193,0.0001609545,0.00002014172,0.00003046186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005264189,0.0002671781,0.3478425,0.00000519238,0.00002955364,1.806252e-7,0.0001456428,0.6294017,0.001049389,0.002662593,0.01774934,0.0007941277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001087455,0.00007117249,0.8408861,0.000005382868,0.00000644789,0.000002877142,0.00009628214,0.1557255,0.00007407387,0.0007338539,0.002213954,0.00007568428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989456,0.000006341406,0.006169,0.0005093327,0.00004029161,0.0001592769,0.0000140075,0.00001868086,0.003627076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994572,0.000003333123,0.00020285,0.000169825,0.00002623035,0.00006826648,0.00002617991,0.000003668729,0.00004248802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4930435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7372824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01199698824151067,"score_gpt":0.1890949106816678,"score_spread":0.1770979224401572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}