{"id":"W2062077605","doi":"10.1139/x05-255","title":"Quantifying size-asymmetric growth among individual beech trees","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beech; Fagus sylvatica; Competition (biology); Growth rate; Mathematics; Thinning; Asymmetry; Ecology; Econometrics; Statistics; Biology; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006634617,0.0002732841,0.0002782585,0.0004531253,0.0003047463,0.0004490645,0.0005099013,0.0004209201,0.0003470338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020348,0.0002408331,0.0003067138,0.0003469692,0.000506499,0.0006955141,0.0005339623,0.0003270161,0.00005406551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008275853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002918396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01256909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02159118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997773,0.00005169955,0.00001350233,0.00008396932,0.00003343648,0.00004006821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990376,0.000465201,0.0002008817,0.0001100424,0.00008689121,0.00009934964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002112558,0.00008286212,0.4017338,0.00003648652,0.0001204953,0.0002238963,0.0005681157,0.5492964,0.03429437,0.002631402,0.0001238763,0.0106771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001753756,0.00006972608,0.2064436,0.000005765748,0.00003390697,0.0001208116,0.000140034,0.7871017,0.003297951,0.002477501,0.0002576255,0.00003372817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983214,0.00001196472,0.001423382,0.000007612328,6.642912e-7,0.00000204597,0.00003711851,0.000008160397,0.0001876183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999154,0.00000615281,0.000729325,0.000002155268,6.364024e-7,0.000002360001,0.00004397117,0.000003343611,0.00005807982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01256909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02499187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04152082083918447,"score_gpt":0.2875317417463433,"score_spread":0.2460109209071588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}