{"id":"W2062216803","doi":"10.1016/j.jmr.2006.12.006","title":"Magnetic field homogeneity: A new approach to orthogonalizing and optimizing shim gradients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance","topic":"Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Shim (computing); Electromagnetic coil; Homogeneity (statistics); Spectrometer; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Magnet; Computer science; Materials science; Magnetic field; Computational physics; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Optics; Physics; Chemistry; Mechanical engineering; Engineering; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001511234,0.001415708,0.0009634313,0.001141267,0.0005959785,0.00129291,0.001383953,0.0007711587,0.002002214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004129922,0.0008242119,0.0009712804,0.001054945,0.0007529423,0.001893132,0.001403696,0.00128543,0.0007147286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004095439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001443617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002512896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993132,0.0001750893,0.00003780772,0.0001337943,0.0003040041,0.00003608853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989147,0.0004560485,0.0001239996,0.0001807738,0.0002789876,0.00004547344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003086852,0.0002005946,0.001300646,0.0003849745,0.000271543,0.0001294891,0.0002877833,0.1155229,0.1723479,0.05920575,0.004153244,0.6458865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005446002,0.0001929752,0.001410614,0.00002888932,0.0002214411,0.0003684684,0.00006119216,0.8920271,0.06481095,0.02595605,0.01476556,0.0001022579],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001850813,0.00007519151,0.9973292,0.00002936558,0.00001387036,0.00001796107,0.00001520509,0.0002403092,0.0004280352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03516964,0.0002936119,0.9619762,0.00006010794,0.00007901491,0.00008408479,0.00009444598,0.0006294511,0.001613321],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002002214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007992268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02586221585206058,"score_gpt":0.3087433922653078,"score_spread":0.2828811764132473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}