{"id":"W2062328376","doi":"10.1021/jp308787z","title":"<sup>29</sup>Si Chemical Shift Anisotropies in Hydrated Calcium Silicates: A Computational Study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry C","topic":"Glass properties and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Calcium silicate; Anisotropy; Calcium silicate hydrate; Silicate; Tetrahedron; Isotropy; Tobermorite; Hydrate; Chemical shift; Materials science; Chemistry; Mineralogy; Chemical physics; Crystallography; Cement; Physical chemistry; Composite material; Optics; Organic chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002044417,0.0001504146,0.0002738513,0.00001418168,0.00008911743,0.00007857449,0.0005326518,0.00004101032,0.0002750046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006084874,0.00009136962,0.00007835007,0.0001753662,0.0001854909,0.0001739993,0.0001140191,0.0003054816,0.0001381402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006361362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006992532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008382315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.423048e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987744,0.00006595268,0.0004121723,0.0001480639,0.0003683447,0.0002310287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991096,0.0001993035,0.00020547,0.0002103198,0.0001696997,0.0001056336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003850448,0.000736365,0.0001996383,0.00001563677,0.0000135146,0.000002225598,0.001574397,0.01271229,0.9841961,0.00003686824,0.0004129212,0.00006148408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001474567,0.0002318113,0.00480361,0.00006092977,0.0000768887,0.00004907371,0.003754202,0.0563888,0.9264561,0.006185773,0.0002029906,0.0003152792],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981054,0.00002905771,0.00008600001,0.001333492,0.000007604054,0.0001836938,0.000005894452,0.00001762308,0.0002312137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994612,0.000001111714,0.0001173377,0.0000655279,0.0002662865,0.00002369463,0.000002886742,0.00001210255,0.00004980157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05774008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3725945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01510665150867286,"score_gpt":0.2524685123226235,"score_spread":0.2373618608139506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}