{"id":"W2062328376","doi":"10.1021/jp308787z","title":"<sup>29</sup>Si Chemical Shift Anisotropies in Hydrated Calcium Silicates: A Computational Study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry C","topic":"Glass properties and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Calcium silicate; Anisotropy; Calcium silicate hydrate; Silicate; Tetrahedron; Isotropy; Tobermorite; Hydrate; Chemical shift; Materials science; Chemistry; Mineralogy; Chemical physics; Crystallography; Cement; Physical chemistry; Composite material; Optics; Organic chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006553777,0.000677079,0.001085917,0.0006541103,0.000849724,0.0009578213,0.001524887,0.001780801,0.005147424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001914314,0.0005749695,0.0009719094,0.001083895,0.0009567209,0.0006432306,0.0006748352,0.001019722,0.0003563871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00114088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001622361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02147157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02178643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998838,0.00003412353,0.000004931973,0.00001713832,0.00003032085,0.00002982794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980586,0.001541015,0.00008398148,0.00009095853,0.0001533343,0.0000719699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001520486,0.00008426922,0.002536825,0.0001027363,0.00004224721,0.0001828439,0.0000327111,0.9903942,0.0006380295,0.002783728,0.001036975,0.002013306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006484152,0.00002892589,0.0005309882,0.000008324549,0.00001201923,0.00001657368,0.00003844258,0.9977745,0.0003059234,0.000887708,0.0003266005,0.000005061393],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714555,0.0004487318,0.006562917,0.0008170903,0.0000419842,0.00005088142,0.001884127,0.0002543256,0.01848441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879362,0.0002663284,0.008160634,0.0001834111,0.00003133706,0.0001056167,0.001299595,0.000121772,0.001895081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02147157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04269314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01510665150867286,"score_gpt":0.2524685123226235,"score_spread":0.2373618608139506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}