{"id":"W2062334353","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2005.01.004","title":"An efficient preconditioning technique using Krylov subspace methods for 3D characteristics solvers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Generalized minimal residual method; Krylov subspace; Preconditioner; Solver; Linear system; Iterative method; Residual; Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Biconjugate gradient stabilized method; Projection (relational algebra); Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004894019,0.0009042861,0.0008786429,0.0005064472,0.0005771674,0.000761706,0.001157978,0.0009065049,0.007422929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002047235,0.0004161643,0.0006224606,0.0008699434,0.0005561864,0.0009615563,0.00151953,0.001702949,0.002428753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002288481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001243304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003258866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006136768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996141,0.000118819,0.00002235877,0.0000327225,0.0001738181,0.00003800349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992858,0.0002365874,0.00005238077,0.0001352877,0.0002313832,0.00005868802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000367084,0.0002109645,0.0006856449,0.0003869817,0.00008910482,0.0003374407,0.0003119629,0.3766083,0.03707573,0.0829159,0.02059035,0.4804206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002556964,0.00003676064,0.00007441968,0.000008993277,0.000007025325,0.00004270767,0.0000197263,0.9815833,0.004383193,0.007508008,0.006295936,0.0000142514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004340663,0.00006297058,0.9928883,0.00008103878,0.0001001143,0.00003128357,0.00006146602,0.0005608007,0.001873396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08848958,0.00020658,0.9058052,0.000108306,0.00009091335,0.0001925989,0.0002927255,0.0005946309,0.00421935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007422929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02483213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02962166224246426,"score_gpt":0.3617712318611992,"score_spread":0.3321495696187349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}