{"id":"W2062414585","doi":"10.1108/01437730710835443","title":"Leader‐member exchange and attitudinal outcomes: role of procedural justice climate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Procedural justice; Social psychology; Mediation; Organizational justice; Organizational commitment; Loyalty; Perceived organizational support; Continuance; Structural equation modeling; Economic Justice; Affect (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Marketing; Business; Perception","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003601546,0.0002601435,0.0002391536,0.0004525022,0.000886918,0.001641609,0.0003511395,0.0003425499,0.003429177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01156131,0.0001107731,0.0002144342,0.0003489137,0.0009627953,0.0005882742,0.001243327,0.0008817973,0.0002723576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000379447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001061418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009001069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001394606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.00183558,0.0001301373,0.0002003882,0.0004055106,0.000391586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785388,0.008511674,0.008469502,0.001105432,0.001058736,0.002315841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001758396,0.001015664,0.9704121,0.00008705015,0.00007589239,0.0001225609,0.004753597,0.0002586583,0.0007475856,0.001484291,0.0001835065,0.02068329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007648412,0.0003632779,0.9908583,0.00005441174,0.00002557799,0.00008375767,0.005995807,0.0006293846,0.000506228,0.0009475216,0.0005172695,0.00001088452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970047,0.00006548962,0.0004274883,0.0001859487,0.000007020387,0.00001689423,0.00001749056,0.000004201054,0.002270836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996785,0.00001630757,0.0001079326,0.00002189557,0.000004431904,0.000009048465,0.00001030296,8.850436e-7,0.0001506966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003601546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01904702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0531493825055581,"score_gpt":0.265873646216146,"score_spread":0.2127242637105879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}