{"id":"W2062452883","doi":"10.2307/3316009","title":"Empirical likelihood for linear regression models under imputation for missing responses","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Empirical likelihood; Mathematics; Statistics; Imputation (statistics); Confidence interval; Likelihood-ratio test; Linear regression; Missing data; Regression analysis; Econometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008455259,0.0001418068,0.000316,0.0001879665,0.0002186031,0.00006871037,0.0001381497,0.0001049276,0.00004970678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008435648,0.000116549,0.00008031397,0.0001073393,0.00007823467,0.00009654909,0.000005606554,0.0001582098,9.828166e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001512374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001405074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009643864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986185,0.0001084622,0.0006038253,0.0001295399,0.0001724472,0.0003672077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929287,0.005139811,0.0003442238,0.0001162226,0.0008843804,0.0005866853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000979365,0.0001089785,0.0007547056,0.000405432,0.0001443827,0.0002090304,0.001778682,0.0007660855,0.0002858152,0.6115716,0.1093172,0.2736787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006600607,0.0004155614,0.0003214566,0.0001734528,0.00009517974,0.00009070648,0.0001929465,0.07045411,0.00008057812,0.9238572,0.003516638,0.0001421354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005837768,0.0001141985,0.9914435,0.001102524,0.0003129828,0.0002297496,0.0008536218,0.000006331464,0.00009932232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04884772,0.00001915845,0.9503443,0.0003313499,0.0002488235,0.00000660549,0.00001241861,0.0000341482,0.0001554512],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3122856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2585600432776193,"score_gpt":0.4361599736847908,"score_spread":0.1775999304071715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}