{"id":"W2062526510","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00686.x","title":"Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heredity","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Biology; Outcrossing; Sexual dimorphism; Assortative mating; Mating; Narcissus; Zoology; Pollen; Mating system; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001121555,0.00008818715,0.0002211891,0.000006395956,0.0001631252,0.00000778782,0.00009717687,0.0000555672,0.0002847683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001116147,0.0000357772,0.00002929891,0.0001572464,0.0001096119,0.00006834752,0.00005388088,0.00008675845,0.000009237829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001593761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002771157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001220381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004196406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993495,0.00003117413,0.0001573242,0.0001680182,0.0001092153,0.000184823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997922,0.00007946126,0.00004413644,0.00001779057,0.00002106024,0.00004538315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005392903,0.0001115972,0.9656348,0.00001290311,0.00001017595,0.000005754553,0.0001603321,0.000002710265,0.0119085,0.0001556758,0.00852471,0.01341895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126114,0.00009616007,0.986969,0.00003597827,0.000005471762,0.000001905835,0.000126128,0.00004948843,0.0002593452,0.0002780368,0.01196278,0.00008959987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976251,0.0005296986,7.285996e-7,0.0004399486,0.00002434848,0.00008350356,0.0001605819,0.00002039195,0.001115673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992873,0.0001250949,0.00002393681,0.00001202628,0.0001627312,0.0000042723,0.00001754857,3.492232e-7,0.0003667267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02133423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3118014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04281430199905451,"score_gpt":0.2179922405890357,"score_spread":0.1751779385899812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}