{"id":"W2062556935","doi":"10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.018","title":"Typing of Clostridium perfringens by multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeats analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Veterinary Microbiology","topic":"Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph; Canadian Poultry Research Council","keywords":"Multiple Loci VNTR Analysis; Variable number tandem repeat; Biology; Clostridium perfringens; Typing; Genetics; Tandem repeat; Locus (genetics); Population; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; Amplicon; Computational biology; Genome; Polymerase chain reaction; Genotype; Gene; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006944802,0.0003636667,0.0006077063,0.001894378,0.0003982315,0.0004904026,0.0004226308,0.0005424605,0.0009733356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002247302,0.0001667001,0.0004629141,0.001420125,0.0002384912,0.0003013331,0.0002384685,0.0004864633,0.0003986854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002662734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003021098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002806233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003225915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990876,0.0001797142,0.00008382613,0.0002085304,0.0002783282,0.000161945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982883,0.0005920341,0.0003766185,0.0001112862,0.0004584004,0.0001732223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001411806,0.0003409401,0.09693291,0.0001536981,0.00007409713,0.0006102872,0.000288282,0.0004848613,0.8662843,0.00016243,0.0002877697,0.03296858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007504554,0.002972767,0.5295854,0.0001348792,0.0003957833,0.006971372,0.001055425,0.00736423,0.4440503,0.0004814097,0.006847297,0.00006606591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915136,0.000604605,0.005802371,0.00007776268,0.00004789458,0.00005331701,0.0007586303,0.00004682376,0.001095149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825446,0.0003067713,0.01455707,0.0000856823,0.00003190889,0.00002907688,0.00125812,0.00002534078,0.001161618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002806233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005579829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02630344254593777,"score_gpt":0.3195684630416683,"score_spread":0.2932650204957306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}