{"id":"W2062563255","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.032","title":"Usefulness and safety of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization for refractory angina pectoris","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Angina; Revascularization; Ejection fraction; Clinical endpoint; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Cardiology; Placebo; Adverse effect; Percutaneous; Technician; Refractory (planetary science); Medical therapy; Surgery; Heart failure; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047429,0.00008185743,0.0005319064,0.00007817263,0.00004337502,0.000002829179,0.0000584506,0.00003025879,0.000001614275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001056408,0.00005038881,0.0002205889,0.00009589943,0.0002383322,0.00002718597,0.00001634022,0.0001150863,5.771167e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007269614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005837773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009942555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.981824e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999324,0.0001343038,0.0002231792,0.00007951436,0.0001238133,0.0001151514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992317,0.0001559911,0.000278225,0.000153487,0.0001350328,0.00004553996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06587251,0.001038052,0.3943132,0.0008200005,0.04556283,0.004868359,0.01036999,0.05192594,0.0433622,0.007512855,0.005876812,0.3684772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01855879,0.02291489,0.8535337,0.0003260978,0.008909089,0.01773333,0.004081594,0.00007586261,0.001630115,0.004192928,0.06752209,0.0005214886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977428,0.0004281378,0.02003555,0.001337747,0.0002013241,0.0002383807,0.000005369041,0.000005733532,0.0003197641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978177,0.0006954348,0.0008854556,0.0001692048,0.0003811062,0.000003135534,0.000004032877,0.00001030634,0.00003362259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4592205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2054796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01137725630844186,"score_gpt":0.2517212408269442,"score_spread":0.2403439845185024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}