{"id":"W2062563255","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.032","title":"Usefulness and safety of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization for refractory angina pectoris","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Angina; Revascularization; Ejection fraction; Clinical endpoint; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Cardiology; Placebo; Adverse effect; Percutaneous; Technician; Refractory (planetary science); Medical therapy; Surgery; Heart failure; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001289182,0.0001993625,0.0004654797,0.0006477121,0.0004399452,0.0006380885,0.0002191454,0.0007442034,0.001551447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01196077,0.00009525482,0.0003905441,0.0003993901,0.0005052672,0.0006121277,0.0001630045,0.0007848694,0.0002130193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004317827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003408414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006120194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008547292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989323,0.0006126996,0.00005901647,0.00008145865,0.0002486711,0.00006588021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989723,0.008062144,0.001023753,0.0003036302,0.000585195,0.0003022982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07166103,0.002182871,0.4833307,0.0008559069,0.0008069881,0.002408041,0.0007359973,0.001574687,0.02739589,0.001534481,0.001296816,0.4062166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001411087,0.02504413,0.9448557,0.0002128063,0.001518156,0.006537534,0.0005293196,0.006925057,0.008137404,0.001770852,0.002995884,0.00006199363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832619,0.009731749,0.0008151258,0.0007192692,0.00008561166,0.00001771873,0.00007655649,0.00002371153,0.00526846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986026,0.0007084924,0.0001577822,0.0001117561,0.0001917709,0.000006004129,0.00002253038,0.000004072815,0.0001950399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001551447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006817937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01137725630844186,"score_gpt":0.2517212408269442,"score_spread":0.2403439845185024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}