{"id":"W2062572369","doi":"10.1504/ijssoc.2013.050532","title":"Between field and table: environmental implications of local food distribution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Society","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Distribution (mathematics); Business; Food systems; Carbon footprint; Food distribution; Sustainability; Scale (ratio); Ecological footprint; Environmental economics; Food processing; Marketing; Economics; Geography; Greenhouse gas; Food security; Agriculture; Food science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001735342,0.00005900504,0.00009509905,0.000003709945,0.00006998701,0.00002087762,0.0001600057,0.00006766666,0.00008005046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002127147,0.00002408683,0.0000920368,0.00008269487,0.0000476282,0.0002308897,0.00007499154,0.0001109953,5.046712e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008024902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009683718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001879339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001528484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994001,0.00001466868,0.0001973162,0.00005371948,0.0001872568,0.0001469089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995057,0.00009710412,0.0001799955,0.00001584422,0.0001265931,0.00007477167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007030027,0.000799855,0.5892002,0.00003969527,0.0008061966,0.000005398254,0.001556642,0.00001050436,0.1271054,0.01680246,0.04544272,0.2181606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000262551,0.0004476587,0.8707147,0.00001635102,0.0000420439,0.00006065085,0.01901208,0.000002331078,0.01706985,0.00100354,0.09125574,0.0001125158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993413,0.0005222163,0.0004879763,0.005232304,0.00007250207,0.00004869075,0.0001479526,0.000004022014,0.00007138771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905,0.0001209089,0.00004368473,0.00009488325,0.0005414939,9.198508e-7,0.00005941266,4.552337e-7,0.00008822168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2815145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09822324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006545667001308453,"score_gpt":0.2050079162632671,"score_spread":0.1984622492619586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}