{"id":"W2062581021","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.002","title":"The good, the bad, and the ugly: Influence of aesthetics on product feature judgments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Aesthetics; Feature (linguistics); Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Point (geometry); Product design; Perspective (graphical); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Art; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003959721,0.0002488694,0.0002396412,0.0004253379,0.0004285239,0.002419129,0.0002608837,0.0005576852,0.004241637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05082478,0.0002658047,0.0002213436,0.0002665874,0.001242642,0.0009037541,0.000844935,0.0008440622,0.0002750469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002525628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008179196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001192715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968555,0.00168296,0.0001221242,0.0003091451,0.0009086271,0.0001216483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439887,0.04697255,0.004230279,0.001488238,0.002362804,0.0009573515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0188936,0.002544905,0.3893107,0.001087215,0.0004090335,0.000986265,0.01991393,0.004630916,0.3806755,0.009705758,0.003234019,0.1686081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000240127,0.001845814,0.9418069,0.0001204011,0.0001854523,0.0004036021,0.003840359,0.01202254,0.02698091,0.009903527,0.002534957,0.0001153336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894134,0.0001006807,0.00128727,0.0001033386,0.00001496735,0.0000223868,0.00001391879,0.00001838754,0.00902569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998795,0.00002762877,0.0007800965,0.00004678874,0.000008216642,0.000008922228,0.000009739393,0.00001869911,0.0003048443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004241637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0209412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01711537268854723,"score_gpt":0.3386054567616331,"score_spread":0.3214900840730858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}