{"id":"W2062597171","doi":"10.4296/cwrj2503293","title":"A Multiple Case Study of Community-Based Water Management Initiatives in New Brunswick","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Integrated water resources management; Environmental resource management; Sustainable development; Resource (disambiguation); Domain (mathematical analysis); Resource management (computing); Business; Process management; Water resources; Environmental planning; Computer science; Political science; Geography; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002066815,0.000311657,0.0003277874,0.001221139,0.01169238,0.002065687,0.001944206,0.001224749,0.00284101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003334881,0.0003390062,0.0002470109,0.00301073,0.003223233,0.0009315365,0.002443776,0.001207542,0.0001497476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0346871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02113983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7877975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9351719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976481,0.001015526,0.0000695863,0.0001693367,0.0002994121,0.0007980776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975716,0.001115705,0.0002674267,0.0001029385,0.0003698069,0.0005723959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004265231,0.002011933,0.1928669,0.0006654008,0.00009083791,0.08499839,0.5817065,0.005536589,0.008380656,0.03557656,0.00610288,0.08163676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006181648,0.0003069773,0.06249972,0.0002979637,0.00003961276,0.002239624,0.8781255,0.003131895,0.001542136,0.001324949,0.05036937,0.00006048964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870381,0.0002649832,0.00075028,0.001171573,0.00001616799,0.0003347109,0.00007588103,0.000004933655,0.01034342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911121,0.0005108991,0.001546793,0.0002068288,0.000005162573,0.0001839186,0.00006094613,0.000005312874,0.006368003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2122025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4269045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02250660423198252,"score_gpt":0.2421047500105921,"score_spread":0.2195981457786095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}