{"id":"W2062684760","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2009.11.003","title":"Application of game theory to fisheries over three decades","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Game theory; Fisheries management; Externality; Fish stock; Context (archaeology); Fishery; Cooperative game theory; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Stock (firearms); Computer science; Economics; Geography; Microeconomics; Fishing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001465066,0.0001759942,0.0002477525,0.0001466943,0.0002184573,0.0001214809,0.0009288458,0.0001350044,0.0167884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005433181,0.0001580384,0.00007493352,0.001328552,0.0008105064,0.0004370774,0.0007318528,0.0004451125,0.0004156968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001624072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003843247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001186624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007069854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967431,0.0002268041,0.0003288377,0.0005176387,0.001412351,0.000771296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984877,0.000286455,0.00004789391,0.0008164138,0.00009378632,0.000267718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005043108,0.0001771687,0.4327446,0.00003296041,0.00001359446,0.000008260336,0.001017834,0.00001794213,0.006676562,0.004231511,0.03606046,0.5185148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001661752,0.0005243848,0.4970695,0.000005162623,0.000002425848,0.000002139073,0.0001991077,0.000263966,0.002122055,0.01928264,0.4801939,0.0001685256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3863395,0.00002307724,0.004846027,0.003929446,0.00004396911,0.0009561717,0.0000171313,0.00007560957,0.6037691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852145,0.00006393628,0.001604831,0.0003849922,0.0001089212,0.0001751487,0.00001777392,0.00003054726,0.01239934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.598875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03784689874695939,"score_gpt":0.3316659954606412,"score_spread":0.2938190967136818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}