{"id":"W2062867333","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.332-334.1162","title":"The Analysis and Assessment of Test Method for Flammability of an Automotive Headlining Fabric","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Textile materials and evaluations","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Flammability; National standard; SAFER; Engineering; Automotive industry; Test (biology); Forensic engineering; Explosive material; Textile; Test method; Computer science; Materials science; Computer security; Composite material; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01183209,0.0001258479,0.0004984221,0.0001881299,0.0003555513,0.0000867032,0.0003765486,0.00006360919,0.0005191119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002013355,0.00008756234,0.00006084361,0.0004681608,0.0004148892,0.0002580505,0.0002083179,0.00006526605,0.000002555788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004467125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001575757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005656127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001695853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969022,0.001092474,0.0007078478,0.0004081595,0.0004798843,0.000409491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956504,0.002274955,0.0002988112,0.000594437,0.001095706,0.00008573513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001490074,0.0001230674,0.0002913397,0.0001009794,0.0000403828,3.266723e-7,0.0005805895,0.00008671897,0.9901544,0.001307307,0.000003115964,0.00716276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003256274,0.0004863056,0.06354488,0.00001819109,0.00008547636,7.891726e-7,0.0005583661,0.001043731,0.9259257,0.007874842,0.00005084132,0.00008527432],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853206,0.00003590171,0.0130189,0.0000595916,0.0001734489,0.000769611,0.0003964166,0.0000240835,0.0002014263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.831983,0.00003879759,0.1676485,0.000003477795,0.00002938274,0.0002330164,0.00001624141,0.00001359012,0.00003405654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1546296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5683912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1623727466417153,"score_gpt":0.5058509514499279,"score_spread":0.3434782048082126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}