{"id":"W2062890872","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.06.002","title":"Methodological quality and completeness of reporting in clinical trials conducted in livestock species","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Veterinary Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut pour la Recherche en Santé Publique; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Blinding; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Checklist; Randomization; Medicine; Clinical trial; Randomized controlled trial; Rigour; Family medicine; Research design; Psychology; Statistics; Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4986599,0.003843827,0.02108441,0.01491192,0.001965908,0.01026161,0.005918664,0.008112548,0.003193629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8272121,0.005126897,0.04982059,0.01565794,0.006931371,0.007268962,0.00543762,0.006264013,0.0002949509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007560686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008198003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006178708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008749445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2131509,0.4708108,0.2674244,0.01967266,0.02719274,0.001748484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07945824,0.797518,0.07908808,0.02919239,0.0136128,0.001130511],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005053215,0.00007015697,0.04018031,0.2205689,0.7086493,0.0002662902,0.001467263,0.001676102,0.0002890148,0.001845629,0.001840029,0.01809391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006519163,0.001477124,0.04380475,0.05959168,0.8606877,0.000911774,0.0006837549,0.002966458,0.001299378,0.01461779,0.007048076,0.000392323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04966725,0.8665117,0.05679371,0.005412109,0.003493731,0.008984518,0.006239809,0.000285317,0.002611873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8352681,0.08908739,0.04783659,0.005122181,0.001724766,0.01552616,0.004371746,0.0003125984,0.0007503838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5013402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6182417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9924180682264175,"score_gpt":0.7631734473829986,"score_spread":0.2292446208434189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}