{"id":"W2062903678","doi":"10.1007/s10646-011-0784-0","title":"Mercury in the Great Lakes region: bioaccumulation, spatiotemporal patterns, ecological risks, and policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecotoxicology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Riverview Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bioaccumulation; Wildlife; Mercury (programming language); Biota; Methylmercury; Environmental science; Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004521369,0.0001214529,0.0001103552,0.0006815045,0.0003517138,0.0009117047,0.0003211501,0.0005068772,0.0007431417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001180442,0.000152301,0.0001763939,0.001882452,0.001036383,0.0008678619,0.0006387231,0.0002706311,0.00007502058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002455015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003102008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2424993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3851732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997414,0.0001159993,0.00001307653,0.00004271884,0.00004093713,0.00004595137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994893,0.0001230292,0.0002100967,0.00002314591,0.00008149389,0.00007294073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002526045,0.00009253307,0.9380902,0.0003907702,0.0003253588,0.0004763519,0.002004025,0.003394742,0.003774476,0.005250681,0.004382807,0.04156555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008339751,0.00004959321,0.9898107,0.00003930838,0.00005423693,0.0001255292,0.002084319,0.001311344,0.0003525267,0.001371818,0.004779483,0.00001277335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719911,0.007125345,0.0003197045,0.01536663,0.00001584421,0.0000108907,0.001127487,0.00002243028,0.004020452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933156,0.004921253,0.0002641228,0.0004243984,0.00003273739,0.00001001476,0.0001910543,0.000003447591,0.0008373637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7575008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4821755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1069046652691273,"score_gpt":0.3187092432265907,"score_spread":0.2118045779574635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}