{"id":"W2062923575","doi":"10.2118/142854-ms","title":"Assessing Well Integrity Risk: A Qualitative Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada)","funders":"ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Failure mode and effects analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Brainstorming; Risk assessment; Risk management; Ranking (information retrieval); Process (computing); Computer science; Containment (computer programming); Fault tree analysis; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007192407,0.0001106286,0.000278387,0.0002094764,0.0002181112,0.0002228744,0.0005917409,0.00007776637,0.003199682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002525019,0.00006564502,0.0002287733,0.0007386003,0.0001222483,0.0009743198,0.0001078285,0.0002786926,0.001863609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002039644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007494942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001466269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005146474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971896,0.0007854771,0.0005558659,0.0004118291,0.0008616342,0.0001955854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975285,0.001216725,0.000246612,0.0005357974,0.0003570507,0.0001153206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001809496,0.000690307,0.04916638,0.000004179682,0.0002704584,0.00002076496,0.3334219,0.004059062,0.0001884975,0.1692798,0.03620531,0.4065124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009634487,0.00001515158,0.004852221,0.000002322949,0.00002513082,5.449054e-7,0.05909397,0.289974,0.0002805644,0.6451789,0.0003640791,0.0001167833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1707058,0.00002185229,0.5511234,0.0002809756,0.00004437714,0.00002972103,0.000003721135,0.0000317973,0.2777583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940586,0.0000390653,0.0973004,0.0001296629,0.00001431644,0.000002307716,6.895541e-7,0.000004456677,0.008450487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7233528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5181684509160395,"score_gpt":0.5188951000360651,"score_spread":0.0007266491200256242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}