{"id":"W2062923575","doi":"10.2118/142854-ms","title":"Assessing Well Integrity Risk: A Qualitative Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada)","funders":"ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Failure mode and effects analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Brainstorming; Risk assessment; Risk management; Ranking (information retrieval); Process (computing); Computer science; Containment (computer programming); Fault tree analysis; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Computer security; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007116154,0.0010365,0.0004333098,0.002464019,0.00237883,0.006696516,0.003593802,0.002365274,0.01270458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01631171,0.0007260899,0.001374244,0.001991424,0.004610778,0.006773689,0.00316439,0.001551543,0.001017682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01040027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007404153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02146672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01493069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948381,0.002972161,0.0001678598,0.0003393618,0.001299499,0.000383091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830441,0.01199455,0.001029001,0.0007478543,0.002789879,0.0003946039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001184158,0.0003102764,0.005777052,0.000592259,0.000048091,0.0006705116,0.01336779,0.2741092,0.001749185,0.6680858,0.003395546,0.03177582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006952897,0.0002386898,0.001508891,0.0007395144,0.00007853115,0.0002716502,0.02003347,0.5503108,0.002212082,0.379769,0.04465545,0.0001124585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08014764,0.0002873437,0.7486802,0.006957447,0.00008286912,0.001439665,0.001617355,0.0004115448,0.1603759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7658337,0.0005536929,0.2182659,0.0003582384,0.00001698252,0.001608437,0.0006297043,0.00008875305,0.01264464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02146672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07545954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5181684509160395,"score_gpt":0.5188951000360651,"score_spread":0.0007266491200256242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}