{"id":"W2062934264","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0041239","title":"Reliability of the Peer-Review Process for Adverse Event Rating","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Adverse effect; Medicine; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6114064,0.001426318,0.003350207,0.007745877,0.002957439,0.004946268,0.004055079,0.002341198,0.002574288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8578525,0.001507316,0.003128432,0.005461271,0.005369083,0.004561891,0.005725641,0.002703028,0.002308655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003588595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008985084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003242167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003234073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1953751,0.6111001,0.07970301,0.0174125,0.09430358,0.00210573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04470451,0.6257073,0.08690395,0.06432557,0.1761349,0.002223775],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006446144,0.000762175,0.5268883,0.00979982,0.005476759,0.000727389,0.02718489,0.01146237,0.007416489,0.006477382,0.02308411,0.3742742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111253,0.004349655,0.7667059,0.006477983,0.002611769,0.003658626,0.005164004,0.1138738,0.01677402,0.01670358,0.06130217,0.001266009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3307445,0.009320025,0.593587,0.004631683,0.002728147,0.02436041,0.00259133,0.002538941,0.0294979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460593,0.001041224,0.1438566,0.0005050761,0.0006069492,0.005416731,0.001003919,0.000403643,0.001106559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3885936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4792051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7800581212637085,"score_gpt":0.5218225621248295,"score_spread":0.2582355591388791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}