{"id":"W2062956372","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0106365","title":"Scientists versus Regulators: Precaution, Novelty & Regulatory Oversight as Predictors of Perceived Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Health Canada; Rice University; University of California, Santa Barbara; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Novelty; Perception; Risk perception; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009584763,0.0001186263,0.0003022443,0.000160725,0.0001860972,0.00003122058,0.0002813874,0.0001205551,0.001290794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005951053,0.0001227749,0.0000834013,0.0002755332,0.0004406127,0.0002140003,0.0000712691,0.00004631711,0.00007543793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001276752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009118381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006714986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002632231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980337,0.0002211994,0.0003604059,0.0002573001,0.000885744,0.0002416277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989282,0.00008367266,0.0002399528,0.0003800343,0.0002362101,0.0001319055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005261219,0.003034569,0.01360655,0.0005908609,0.0009853021,7.615206e-7,0.04447157,0.0001700386,0.8519865,0.07508335,0.008748591,0.0007958393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004518544,0.000556035,0.8425531,0.0006254608,0.0007305141,2.824533e-7,0.002284144,0.0001615033,0.07847489,0.00104443,0.06830704,0.0007440657],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851808,0.0000255706,0.00006406384,0.0001334445,0.000614568,0.0003819317,0.00002279153,0.00009468829,0.01348217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947948,0.00009172811,0.001003728,0.0000167755,0.0002075203,0.00001250149,0.00002019791,0.00001250231,0.003840261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8289465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08846790027929427,"score_gpt":0.3093230989120539,"score_spread":0.2208551986327596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}