{"id":"W2062956372","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0106365","title":"Scientists versus Regulators: Precaution, Novelty & Regulatory Oversight as Predictors of Perceived Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Health Canada; Rice University; University of California, Santa Barbara; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Novelty; Perception; Risk perception; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02529676,0.0002331156,0.0003076891,0.002315014,0.001729812,0.003353046,0.0008387284,0.002010644,0.002055671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1028538,0.0002421449,0.0005673016,0.001510754,0.003351275,0.001547616,0.002165271,0.001886478,0.0001391309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004237499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01199698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1264735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1298228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828879,0.007421016,0.001127618,0.001300816,0.005999789,0.001262819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8019281,0.1327895,0.04473379,0.002469292,0.01150382,0.006575536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002726835,0.0001565709,0.9580752,0.0002169749,0.0001978687,0.0001486791,0.02074927,0.0007177687,0.0004857295,0.001626974,0.0006651513,0.01668723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003380155,0.0001581117,0.965751,0.0003598041,0.0001198638,0.0001476637,0.02588134,0.001783816,0.0004041981,0.002224105,0.003058844,0.00007744855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900146,0.0008419549,0.001027204,0.002913331,0.00002176273,0.00006109163,0.0001077069,0.000005146735,0.005007285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988888,0.0002129154,0.0003072331,0.000279201,0.00001357132,0.00001712989,0.00003288172,0.000001881927,0.0002465318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2514748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08846790027929427,"score_gpt":0.3093230989120539,"score_spread":0.2208551986327596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}