{"id":"W2063118662","doi":"10.1016/j.ijms.2014.07.035","title":"Comparisons of ambient spray ionization imaging methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mass Spectrometry","topic":"Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Desorption electrospray ionization; Chemistry; Ionization; Ambient ionization; Mass spectrometry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Electrospray ionization; Resolution (logic); Chemical ionization; Ion; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004773738,0.0008004553,0.000539574,0.001657695,0.0005396733,0.001459302,0.001426005,0.001019247,0.003702312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008518767,0.0004363672,0.000514361,0.0009902404,0.0004413364,0.001604924,0.001088845,0.000784746,0.001256645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006635835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006060387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001163575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00236991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973489,0.0004799484,0.0001611645,0.0003413806,0.001541244,0.0001272778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948189,0.001560371,0.0003707147,0.0004238845,0.00271166,0.0001144861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002781726,0.0001743678,0.005071024,0.001505487,0.000276294,0.0001543955,0.0005144317,0.0007822084,0.8597052,0.002105849,0.002607493,0.1243216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001127574,0.001661678,0.04394703,0.000195063,0.0003895659,0.00210899,0.0005037095,0.01265933,0.9033229,0.001465671,0.03346657,0.0001667821],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6511341,0.03944526,0.268225,0.001085825,0.0009257185,0.0006194146,0.00282637,0.002993039,0.03274526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7198687,0.01804123,0.243469,0.0005383248,0.0002624812,0.0004992205,0.003261794,0.001485762,0.01257338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004773738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0252462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01265737795487519,"score_gpt":0.3292128212527157,"score_spread":0.3165554432978405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}