{"id":"W2063156085","doi":"10.1109/saner.2015.7081827","title":"Do code review practices impact design quality? A case study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK projects","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Code review; Software quality; Computer science; Software engineering; Code (set theory); Software; Quality (philosophy); Software peer review; Software construction; Software development; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02178324,0.0004092988,0.0005009197,0.004682551,0.003505645,0.002974214,0.001364775,0.001600322,0.0008647676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1265682,0.0007036954,0.0005255826,0.004760996,0.003294084,0.00364402,0.003143553,0.002181132,0.0002141667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005082571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004853593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0268497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9692485,0.01732495,0.001964687,0.001989213,0.007702755,0.001770001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7079254,0.2035549,0.04735477,0.008304613,0.02496736,0.007893028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004883504,0.001923123,0.6181662,0.0009346268,0.0001635452,0.01185843,0.258819,0.001834416,0.005240852,0.003202502,0.002578817,0.09479019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001383326,0.002242627,0.7645563,0.0007070918,0.0001658235,0.007071832,0.1997534,0.005535433,0.003972572,0.001712633,0.01397836,0.0001655156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970192,0.000239462,0.0009029406,0.0004974962,0.000005508989,0.00008124605,0.00003523826,0.00001297966,0.001205975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963881,0.0003393492,0.002385361,0.0001147352,0.000008309217,0.00009858095,0.00005799919,0.00002155023,0.0005860122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02178324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1152022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3645594215084804,"score_gpt":0.4826728792808219,"score_spread":0.1181134577723416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}