{"id":"W2063198611","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgu003","title":"Case comment: a critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's use of statistical reasoning in R v. Mabior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Criminalization; Supreme court; Sanctions; Argument (complex analysis); Liability; Law; Criminology; Actuarial science; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007295557,0.00005174289,0.0002292064,0.000008962747,0.0000399422,0.000001544357,0.00002217849,0.0000412218,0.000009888041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001111716,0.00003413788,0.00001967774,0.00005137404,0.0002551376,0.00002690899,0.00001747073,0.0001346736,2.225033e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003795828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001606307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5917029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5447066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.0002746314,0.0003005552,0.0001391105,0.0001173132,0.0001068945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991914,0.0002574331,0.0001052782,0.0002572066,0.0001318864,0.00005676984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001135095,0.0005119774,0.8246526,0.002199209,0.0000298309,0.00001909809,0.0007969628,0.00004283879,0.0006123434,0.163076,0.0003129785,0.006611058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001557068,0.0004612781,0.9781998,0.0003400353,0.0001032226,0.0001471272,0.0001793556,0.002091066,0.00367824,0.009780175,0.003378777,0.00008387088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970285,0.00005330755,0.000390075,0.001822404,0.00002936546,0.0004671162,0.000090851,0.000002162679,0.0001161706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981366,0.00002666877,0.001628655,0.0001694416,0.00001523894,0.000007923682,0.000002339068,0.000002953624,0.00001015573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1535472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4636013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02002547739292539,"score_gpt":0.2766432593370159,"score_spread":0.2566177819440905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}