{"id":"W2063341048","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.supplement2.s67","title":"The Use of a Social Cost of Carbon in Canadian Cost-Benefit Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Social cost; Cost–benefit analysis; Public economics; Economics; Climate policy; Government (linguistics); Business; Actuarial science; Climate change; Microeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003743139,0.0001483901,0.0004957402,0.003023898,0.0001635325,0.0001675447,0.0004027456,0.0001707854,0.0005026305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004284609,0.0001676626,0.0001729233,0.001730217,0.0001646973,0.0002671168,0.00003352858,0.0001353766,0.00007407816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001775188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001292332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979518,0.00001611828,0.0007306277,0.0002432104,0.00002588547,0.001032363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983128,0.00009139311,0.000332658,0.000407111,0.00007623026,0.0007798017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002021794,0.00001390156,0.3309036,0.00001241694,0.0002104605,0.000001145472,0.0009918599,0.00009442162,0.000001054649,0.6618991,0.002530671,0.003339268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003279396,0.00001344286,0.5240459,0.000004004825,0.00001821942,0.00000117767,0.0002031861,0.009427881,0.000005262698,0.007083131,0.4585797,0.0002901022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9269524,0.0002284726,0.000002262201,0.02984914,0.0001363983,0.000545559,0.00369582,0.000007097944,0.03858281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974539,0.0001452307,0.00001151972,0.001352799,0.000118034,0.00009441655,0.00007918083,0.00002158136,0.0007233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.654816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6837082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1250252160610641,"score_gpt":0.252412025890339,"score_spread":0.1273868098292749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}