{"id":"W2063341048","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.supplement2.s67","title":"The Use of a Social Cost of Carbon in Canadian Cost-Benefit Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Social cost; Cost–benefit analysis; Public economics; Economics; Climate policy; Government (linguistics); Business; Actuarial science; Climate change; Microeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006663428,0.001147027,0.0008267053,0.007352818,0.002006995,0.004878535,0.001945688,0.001193466,0.00568443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02870022,0.0005159727,0.001764323,0.009695351,0.00229957,0.002101048,0.001744832,0.002487356,0.0002890834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06179781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05802824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9208407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901946,0.003331506,0.0003145499,0.0004715568,0.004824904,0.0008628598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888525,0.003506144,0.0005719559,0.0005276976,0.006248297,0.0002934131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001122147,0.00003604779,0.007849944,0.0008505132,0.0003976743,0.0001852873,0.000529354,0.1416582,0.00031664,0.7395342,0.03029209,0.07823782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001287369,0.0001564324,0.03045047,0.002184864,0.0009781722,0.0004599192,0.001019814,0.2477978,0.001279006,0.347564,0.3675999,0.0003808837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06217051,0.02952987,0.3429565,0.02170706,0.002033339,0.001867574,0.01737675,0.0005349405,0.5218236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8408662,0.01278609,0.1075546,0.002148297,0.0003412872,0.0007369848,0.002621428,0.0003224685,0.03262264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08302456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4483766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1250252160610641,"score_gpt":0.252412025890339,"score_spread":0.1273868098292749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}