{"id":"W2063346799","doi":"10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0","title":"Decision Making Through Dialogue: a Case Study of Analyzing Preservice Teachers’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Science education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Chemistry; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02667166,0.00009401556,0.0001413187,0.001260301,0.002369722,0.0005014869,0.000985264,0.00006164608,0.0001384136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006071868,0.00009016565,0.00002717525,0.006669185,0.001328132,0.001459858,0.0001162436,0.000347456,0.00004226297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006908763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00345973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03248734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0207416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940071,0.001806392,0.0003800013,0.0006678597,0.002512644,0.0006260796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966914,0.001595052,0.0001588564,0.0005279058,0.0008663567,0.0001604215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001461867,0.001724806,0.07126857,0.000009969082,0.000001797161,0.000003311501,0.7825021,0.0002017942,0.0007606333,0.01141772,0.0009168411,0.1311778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002254827,0.0002398827,0.03276338,0.0001325851,0.000003390933,0.000004755588,0.9498172,0.0006615947,0.0002162694,0.01244893,0.003349707,0.0001368664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869765,0.00004642751,0.0001669233,0.001934828,0.001613578,0.0007459438,5.407757e-7,0.00001976544,0.008495505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980322,0.00002687793,0.001039488,0.00006410199,0.0002884706,0.00007310275,0.000001286816,0.000005910911,0.0004685887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.167315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3160970749051142,"score_gpt":0.6119224494255229,"score_spread":0.2958253745204086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}