{"id":"W2063543614","doi":"10.1142/s0219649212500104","title":"Tacit Knowledge Sharing During ERP Acquisition: An Exploratory Multi-Site Case Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","topic":"ERP Systems Implementation and Impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Enterprise resource planning; Negotiation; Knowledge sharing; Process (computing); Knowledge acquisition; Business; Computer science; Explicit knowledge; Exploratory research; Process management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002277663,0.0003017475,0.0003529126,0.001450399,0.0004765311,0.0008121409,0.0003629388,0.00005486934,0.000390743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003253613,0.0002725233,0.0001532247,0.0007096416,0.00002178863,0.02128682,0.0003951415,0.0002164403,0.0013336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002665004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002548646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002982024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001419363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974445,0.00005855995,0.001477677,0.0001384893,0.0004185154,0.0004622806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976017,0.0000186001,0.001253304,0.0003518615,0.0006625833,0.000111961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007237914,0.01322755,0.4574248,0.006342282,0.002328763,0.001535716,0.3378502,0.001022889,0.0003682803,0.01954961,0.03536799,0.1242582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01361101,0.0002591341,0.1565918,0.0005137742,0.0007102689,0.001342193,0.6503364,0.00664199,0.00009651124,0.00004226755,0.1686241,0.001230568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672284,0.000277149,0.004990114,0.00004419175,0.002271459,0.0008996315,0.000003653752,0.0001202336,0.02416519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966697,0.00001032312,0.0004785604,0.000277285,0.002035498,0.00003800741,0.000020385,0.00002880135,0.0004414559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3124862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0548749698925718,"score_gpt":0.3232424556705295,"score_spread":0.2683674857779577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}