{"id":"W2063548620","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.016","title":"Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":497,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Propensity score matching; Observational study; Confounding; Medicine; Odds ratio; Statistics; Regression analysis; Hazard ratio; Confidence interval; Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07861588,0.0024957,0.01312587,0.00576441,0.0005051288,0.002708866,0.002088752,0.00242586,0.004821931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2501971,0.001669266,0.02500507,0.008211569,0.001200598,0.003406444,0.001520957,0.002794789,0.0005729907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001833312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004224126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004279312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007452198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9458497,0.03603142,0.0102133,0.003295111,0.004303166,0.0003073386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7112432,0.2682002,0.00826977,0.005158632,0.00680604,0.0003221634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003775469,0.00007819363,0.007380491,0.3529834,0.2248395,0.0002384956,0.000265107,0.002646494,0.0003074433,0.001997081,0.004173695,0.4013147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005457046,0.001726401,0.01468176,0.06888321,0.8759802,0.0007148747,0.0001894954,0.002767567,0.0008909712,0.008738724,0.01981972,0.0001500403],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00363432,0.9768487,0.01692438,0.0005648874,0.0002680671,0.0005902228,0.0005716333,0.00008783855,0.0005100413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1061275,0.8625534,0.02733249,0.001498381,0.0004184176,0.000944937,0.0006005228,0.0001136795,0.0004105956],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4157655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9794651742196404,"score_gpt":0.7432106376404088,"score_spread":0.2362545365792316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}