{"id":"W2063553793","doi":"10.3148/71.1.2010.41","title":"<i>Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption</i> For Childbearing Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Public Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Methylmercury; Fish consumption; Mercury (programming language); Environmental health; Docosahexaenoic acid; MERCURY EXPOSURE; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Medicine; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Fatty acid; Polyunsaturated fatty acid","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000493725,0.0001899576,0.0001192502,0.0004420219,0.0003397891,0.000324763,0.0002004417,0.0003325545,0.00603436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003154475,0.00008879333,0.0003287036,0.0005149826,0.0002327691,0.0002107231,0.0002371441,0.0001836958,0.0002463298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001139202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002027116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1106699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1979743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997603,0.00008558107,0.00001403439,0.00001752813,0.00007489142,0.00004763549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992855,0.0002819131,0.0002097373,0.0000253479,0.0001324875,0.0000650284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001110736,0.0001080465,0.8948062,0.0004860141,0.0001289529,0.001359673,0.0009886018,0.0007839312,0.001843892,0.001065073,0.004418979,0.09289984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004321531,0.0008488885,0.9690444,0.0004081056,0.0002536642,0.001849298,0.003784965,0.0005307487,0.001567377,0.001282539,0.02036278,0.00002394873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.957824,0.00687107,0.0004880457,0.007981561,0.00003610963,0.00009391473,0.002026108,0.00002699003,0.02465222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924779,0.004187732,0.0008057126,0.0005015036,0.00002509305,0.00002619486,0.000363891,0.000002593292,0.00160927],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2200514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1172438230670723,"score_gpt":0.3804395316082951,"score_spread":0.2631957085412228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}