{"id":"W2063631722","doi":"10.1016/j.elstat.2009.10.002","title":"Charge to radius dependency for conductive particles charged by induction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electrostatics","topic":"Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; General Motors of Canada","keywords":"RADIUS; Particle (ecology); Ionic potential; Charge (physics); Classical electron radius; Exponent; Particle size; Mechanics; Electric charge; Materials science; Physics; Molecular physics; Chemistry; Ion; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006355849,0.0003492429,0.0003654393,0.0007685364,0.0004487643,0.0007125963,0.0007909728,0.0006335256,0.0048032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003590952,0.0002294603,0.0003278498,0.0003035363,0.0008165805,0.0008428158,0.0007538347,0.0008361107,0.001260362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005497474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001690944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004673592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002862211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999727,0.00004450439,0.00001043385,0.0000590365,0.0000966506,0.00006230022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976046,0.001344986,0.0003052396,0.0002098607,0.0004028713,0.0001323094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009403467,0.0001607529,0.002638951,0.0004642791,0.00003674667,0.001984331,0.001068678,0.03800373,0.7135055,0.2002399,0.004902953,0.03605378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009367216,0.0005417829,0.01358851,0.00007544958,0.00008069878,0.003160736,0.0003381209,0.3733534,0.5554044,0.04512013,0.00805502,0.0001880757],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8099741,0.004416262,0.121938,0.001886398,0.0003398952,0.0001068481,0.0002533933,0.001166462,0.0599187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908846,0.0006473485,0.002823544,0.0001701591,0.00006040858,0.00001510719,0.00008838122,0.0002175581,0.005092903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01606834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006824134030771211,"score_gpt":0.2314135104610834,"score_spread":0.2245893764303122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}