{"id":"W2063631722","doi":"10.1016/j.elstat.2009.10.002","title":"Charge to radius dependency for conductive particles charged by induction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electrostatics","topic":"Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; General Motors of Canada","keywords":"RADIUS; Particle (ecology); Ionic potential; Charge (physics); Classical electron radius; Exponent; Particle size; Mechanics; Electric charge; Materials science; Physics; Molecular physics; Chemistry; Ion; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002394943,0.0001510735,0.0002549514,0.00014402,0.00005969984,0.00004134569,0.0001334653,0.00007229068,0.000006174946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000827251,0.0001456011,0.00008912775,0.0002361184,0.00001196491,0.0001960649,0.000003296373,0.0002644397,0.000003586921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001932812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.584322e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002766639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988859,0.00001499179,0.0004304452,0.00009212787,0.0001891267,0.0003873616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993793,0.00004799687,0.000120668,0.00009615661,0.0002068074,0.0001490081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006514916,0.00007052963,0.00002641159,0.00001131333,0.00007025598,0.000003551872,0.0003719396,0.002267811,0.9811268,0.003041719,0.007140028,0.005804485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002357831,0.005570771,0.0004806839,0.00005794421,0.0001831842,0.0002573353,0.0001392969,0.4866747,0.4661374,0.0330634,0.004327007,0.0007504373],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8480911,0.0006008688,0.1500002,0.0006816925,0.0002832766,0.0002189284,0.00002897854,0.00003607482,0.00005885318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891191,0.0003041079,0.01006452,0.0002434485,0.0001487814,0.000005085141,0.00001299402,0.00003209543,0.0000698789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5149894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.593744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006824134030771211,"score_gpt":0.2314135104610834,"score_spread":0.2245893764303122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}