{"id":"W2063676347","doi":"10.1007/s11160-009-9103-8","title":"Linking fish population dynamics to habitat conditions: insights from the application of a process-oriented approach to several Great Lakes species","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Michigan State University; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Habitat; Salvelinus; Micropterus; Perch; Biology; Bass (fish); Fishery; Trout; Ecology; Population; Critical habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Endangered species","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001761091,0.0005036173,0.0004945476,0.001537083,0.0007663337,0.001428312,0.000928775,0.0008073578,0.001371948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004958408,0.0002504495,0.001046547,0.002411021,0.001308054,0.001183885,0.001104744,0.0007914531,0.00009122924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001017901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03157516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03233039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996663,0.0001640801,0.00001744412,0.00007519776,0.00004490045,0.00003207153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979411,0.001557052,0.0002345073,0.00007889033,0.0001192194,0.00006931189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003005641,0.000505745,0.5026689,0.000916873,0.001140263,0.0009852215,0.009578614,0.1563726,0.01176073,0.07752082,0.001138112,0.2371117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003528486,0.0004109459,0.702923,0.000113497,0.0004530361,0.0002778152,0.004681759,0.1783653,0.001481898,0.1079067,0.003239376,0.000111335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9174523,0.002496548,0.07091577,0.00106209,0.00002587566,0.00007529179,0.0001692268,0.00005859342,0.007744138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824265,0.001963671,0.0147786,0.00009816865,0.00001745517,0.00005665566,0.00009089208,0.00001913678,0.0005488226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03157516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06278276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0164506827839151,"score_gpt":0.2546151658377211,"score_spread":0.2381644830538061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}