{"id":"W2063680695","doi":"10.1139/f04-228","title":"Comparison of virtual population analysis and statistical kill-at-age analysis for a recreational, kill-dominated fishery","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Stock assessment; Fishing; Population; Statistics; Selectivity; Fishery; Mean squared prediction error; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02309446,0.0005676148,0.0009734941,0.001367309,0.0005191792,0.001186712,0.001401401,0.0009169805,0.0008069283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08314937,0.0006392764,0.001128854,0.0006984923,0.001242848,0.002622877,0.001472445,0.0009296737,0.000146589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002010352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001883402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007238185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923922,0.00550349,0.000356018,0.00068865,0.0008171629,0.0002425639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8464804,0.1342949,0.004841422,0.007348115,0.006087387,0.0009478045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006030747,0.0000857799,0.03903819,0.00008714669,0.0003719896,0.00007695775,0.0003334571,0.9137166,0.0009251895,0.01348612,0.0004765305,0.03079897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003452551,0.0002574978,0.006351857,0.00002299838,0.00004228024,0.00007795194,0.00008113089,0.9831512,0.0007458559,0.008927761,0.000267107,0.00003984829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8266987,0.0001973571,0.170073,0.0003788619,0.00004215977,0.00008305263,0.00025172,0.0003262959,0.001948844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614048,0.00006566146,0.03774214,0.00006392363,0.000009131257,0.00009918207,0.000233951,0.00005794847,0.0003232046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02309446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1221367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02181741842378266,"score_gpt":0.2730266887791483,"score_spread":0.2512092703553656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}