{"id":"W2063728630","doi":"10.1139/v09-024","title":"Glycosidic bond cleavage in deoxynucleotides — A density functional study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Nucleobase; Chemistry; Glycosidic bond; Hydrogen bond; Nucleophile; Cleavage (geology); Bond cleavage; Molecule; Stereochemistry; Computational chemistry; DNA; Organic chemistry; Enzyme; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002197723,0.0001591672,0.0002030853,0.00004863888,0.00006949563,0.00003549739,0.0002623627,0.0001577289,0.00007328408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001461881,0.000165692,0.0001120973,0.0001084535,0.00007121302,0.000008470973,0.00001547595,0.000272137,0.00000366078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008324473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007343075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001243211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000950161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989846,0.00001603027,0.0003463337,0.0002042204,0.000152431,0.0002963694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990303,0.000006947815,0.0001500283,0.0002409705,0.0001119618,0.0004597715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119268,0.000127523,0.05485089,0.00001243285,0.00003781999,0.0004533047,0.00009505411,0.00001583018,0.9259151,0.000001597219,0.01756279,0.0008157702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001279653,0.0002456369,0.08720378,0.00003651659,0.0000247329,0.0005899082,0.0007463896,0.000001960482,0.9043621,0.0001326012,0.005131137,0.0002455256],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994059,0.0004726691,0.00001781233,0.0002060359,0.00009146673,0.00005044105,0.000006017118,0.000002761473,0.005093854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988421,0.0000138514,0.00007452321,0.0002879156,0.0003870852,8.457985e-7,0.00001301018,0.00001300823,0.0003676654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03235288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6756724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006688309157527973,"score_gpt":0.2020960214164647,"score_spread":0.1954077122589367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}